Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 03:27

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Walmart Nintendo Switch 2 pre-order: some US customers can buy it again - The Shortcut | Matt Swider
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
The people who are 'allergic' to humans - BBC
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Why Stocks Are up and Oil Is Down As the US and Iran Trade Strikes - Business Insider
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Thank you.
What’s next?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What is the message of Ex Machina?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Morning Briefing: Lindor Ties Jeter on Home Run Leaderboard - Metsmerized Online
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Neanderthals Spread Across Asia With Surprising Speed—and Now We Know How - Gizmodo